Difference between revisions of "Central and Eastern Europe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ==Croatia== | |
* a group of [[Zagreb]]-based experimentators, [[Vjenceslav Richter]], [[Ivan Picelj]], [[Julije Knifer]], [[Aleksandar Srnec]], and others who founded [[Exat 51]] group, and organised [[New Tendencies]] exhibition series (1961-73). | * a group of [[Zagreb]]-based experimentators, [[Vjenceslav Richter]], [[Ivan Picelj]], [[Julije Knifer]], [[Aleksandar Srnec]], and others who founded [[Exat 51]] group, and organised [[New Tendencies]] exhibition series (1961-73). | ||
* [[Vojin Bakić]] | * [[Vojin Bakić]] | ||
| Line 18: | Line 14: | ||
* [[Goran Trbuljak]] | * [[Goran Trbuljak]] | ||
| − | + | ==Serbia== | |
* [[Petar Milojević]] | * [[Petar Milojević]] | ||
* [[Rechenzentrum des Instituts Boris Kidrič, Vinča]] | * [[Rechenzentrum des Instituts Boris Kidrič, Vinča]] | ||
| Line 25: | Line 21: | ||
* [[Bálint Szombathy]] | * [[Bálint Szombathy]] | ||
| − | + | ==Macedonia== | |
* [[Ilija Šoškić]] | * [[Ilija Šoškić]] | ||
| − | + | ==Czech Republic== | |
| + | * [[Media art in Czech Republic]] | ||
* [[Jiří Bielecki]] | * [[Jiří Bielecki]] | ||
* [[Jarmila Cihankova]] | * [[Jarmila Cihankova]] | ||
| Line 37: | Line 34: | ||
* [[Jan Kubiček]], neo-constructivist | * [[Jan Kubiček]], neo-constructivist | ||
| − | + | ==Slovakia== | |
| + | * [[Media art in Slovakia]] | ||
* [[Štefan Belohradský]] | * [[Štefan Belohradský]] | ||
* [[Tamara Klimova]] | * [[Tamara Klimova]] | ||
* [[Miloš Urbásek]] | * [[Miloš Urbásek]] | ||
| − | + | ==Hungary== | |
| + | * [[Media art in Hungary]] | ||
* [[Sándor Szandaï]] | * [[Sándor Szandaï]] | ||
* [[Anonymous Collective]] | * [[Anonymous Collective]] | ||
| − | + | ==Poland== | |
| + | * [[Media art in Poland]] | ||
* [[Edward Krasinski]] | * [[Edward Krasinski]] | ||
* [[Henryk Stażewski]], a member of many international groups before the war, not only remained influential, but continued his artistic career almost till the end of his long life (died in 1988) | * [[Henryk Stażewski]], a member of many international groups before the war, not only remained influential, but continued his artistic career almost till the end of his long life (died in 1988) | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
* [[Władysław Strzemiński]] (died in early 1950s) | * [[Władysław Strzemiński]] (died in early 1950s) | ||
| − | + | ==former GDR (Eastern Germany)== | |
* [[Hermann Glöckner]], a very active artist almost till the end of his very long live (died in 1987), i.e. till the eighties, however, his influences among young East-German artists were not very significant | * [[Hermann Glöckner]], a very active artist almost till the end of his very long live (died in 1987), i.e. till the eighties, however, his influences among young East-German artists were not very significant | ||
| − | + | ==Romania== | |
* [[111]], neo-constructivist group | * [[111]], neo-constructivist group | ||
* [[Sigma]], neo-constructivist group | * [[Sigma]], neo-constructivist group | ||
| − | + | ==former Soviet Union (Russia)== | |
* [[Dvizheniye]] (Movement) group (early 1960s-1970s) | * [[Dvizheniye]] (Movement) group (early 1960s-1970s) | ||
* [[ARGO]] group (early 1970s) | * [[ARGO]] group (early 1970s) | ||
| − | + | ==Electro-acoustic music studios== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* [[Polish Radio Experimental Studio]] Warszawa, *1957 | * [[Polish Radio Experimental Studio]] Warszawa, *1957 | ||
* [[Studio of Experimental Music Plzeň]], *1965 | * [[Studio of Experimental Music Plzeň]], *1965 | ||
| Line 73: | Line 70: | ||
* [[Electroacoustic Music Studio]] Katowice, *1992 | * [[Electroacoustic Music Studio]] Katowice, *1992 | ||
| − | + | ==Electro-acoustic music societies== | |
| − | * [[Polish Society for Electroacoustic Music]], *2005 | + | * [[Polish Society for Electroacoustic Music]], Krakow *2005 |
* [[Society for Electroacoustic Music]] Prague+Brno *1990 | * [[Society for Electroacoustic Music]] Prague+Brno *1990 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==neo-constructivism== | ||
| + | ''All neo-constructivists favored the discourse of freedom expressed in a more or less orthodox language of geometry. The crucial question, however, to repeat after Rosalind Krauss, is: how was the expression of freedom possible in that way, if the "grid," a system of intersecting lines, allegedly discovered anew again and again, is one of the most stereotypical visual devices? Furthermore, as the American art historian suggests, all the artists who started using "grid" as their "own" means of expression brought their artistic evolution to an end, since in many respects (structural, logical, as well as commonsensical) that particular figure can only be repeated.2 What was then the justification of the discourse of freedom or, more precisely, of its mythologization in the artistic practice of the Central European neo-constructivists? Most likely, it was the negative function of that art; the fact that under the specific historical circumstances it was directed against the socialist realism, absolutizing "form" (or even "pure form") while the authorities, particularly in the early fifties, were conducting a campaign against the so-called "formalism" identified with the bourgeois culture. According to the doctrine of the socialist realism, the form was supposed to be "national" ("narodnaya"), and the content "socialist." On the contrary, the neo-constructivists preferred the form to be universal, whereas the so-called content did not exist for then at all.'' [http://www.pogranicze.sejny.pl/archiwum/krasnogruda/pismo/8/forum/piotr.htm] | ||
Revision as of 02:24, 2 July 2008
Contents
Croatia
- a group of Zagreb-based experimentators, Vjenceslav Richter, Ivan Picelj, Julije Knifer, Aleksandar Srnec, and others who founded Exat 51 group, and organised New Tendencies exhibition series (1961-73).
- Vojin Bakić
- Vlado Kristl
- Miroslav Šutej
- Juraj Dobrović
- Koloman Novak
- Fedora Orebić
- Ante Vulin
- Vilko Žiljak
- Tomislav Mikulić
- Braco Dimitrijević
- Goran Trbuljak
Serbia
- Petar Milojević
- Rechenzentrum des Instituts Boris Kidrič, Vinča
- Zoran Radović
- László Szalma
- Bálint Szombathy
Macedonia
Czech Republic
- Media art in Czech Republic
- Jiří Bielecki
- Jarmila Cihankova
- Radoslav Kratina
- Jiří Hilmar
- Hugo Demartini, neo-constructivist
- Stanislav Kolibal, neo-constructivist
- Jan Kubiček, neo-constructivist
Slovakia
Hungary
Poland
- Media art in Poland
- Edward Krasinski
- Henryk Stażewski, a member of many international groups before the war, not only remained influential, but continued his artistic career almost till the end of his long life (died in 1988)
- Katarzyna Kobro (died in early 1950s)
- Władysław Strzemiński (died in early 1950s)
former GDR (Eastern Germany)
- Hermann Glöckner, a very active artist almost till the end of his very long live (died in 1987), i.e. till the eighties, however, his influences among young East-German artists were not very significant
Romania
former Soviet Union (Russia)
- Dvizheniye (Movement) group (early 1960s-1970s)
- ARGO group (early 1970s)
Electro-acoustic music studios
- Polish Radio Experimental Studio Warszawa, *1957
- Studio of Experimental Music Plzeň, *1965
- Experimental Studio of Slovak Radio Bratislava, *1965
- Electro-acoustic Music Studio Krakow, *1973
- Electroacoustic Music Studio Katowice, *1992
Electro-acoustic music societies
- Polish Society for Electroacoustic Music, Krakow *2005
- Society for Electroacoustic Music Prague+Brno *1990
neo-constructivism
All neo-constructivists favored the discourse of freedom expressed in a more or less orthodox language of geometry. The crucial question, however, to repeat after Rosalind Krauss, is: how was the expression of freedom possible in that way, if the "grid," a system of intersecting lines, allegedly discovered anew again and again, is one of the most stereotypical visual devices? Furthermore, as the American art historian suggests, all the artists who started using "grid" as their "own" means of expression brought their artistic evolution to an end, since in many respects (structural, logical, as well as commonsensical) that particular figure can only be repeated.2 What was then the justification of the discourse of freedom or, more precisely, of its mythologization in the artistic practice of the Central European neo-constructivists? Most likely, it was the negative function of that art; the fact that under the specific historical circumstances it was directed against the socialist realism, absolutizing "form" (or even "pure form") while the authorities, particularly in the early fifties, were conducting a campaign against the so-called "formalism" identified with the bourgeois culture. According to the doctrine of the socialist realism, the form was supposed to be "national" ("narodnaya"), and the content "socialist." On the contrary, the neo-constructivists preferred the form to be universal, whereas the so-called content did not exist for then at all. [1]
