Difference between revisions of "Sigma"

From Monoskop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 32: Line 32:
 
our times, one that was believed to be controllable, science-based,
 
our times, one that was believed to be controllable, science-based,
 
computational, and eventually thoroughly intelligible. </blockquote>
 
computational, and eventually thoroughly intelligible. </blockquote>
Source: Erwin Kessler, "Making Art by Numbers" [www.plural-magazine.com/article_making_art_by_numbers.html]
+
Source: Erwin Kessler, "Making Art by Numbers" [http://www.plural-magazine.com/article_making_art_by_numbers.html]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
; Articles
 +
* Ileana Pintilie, "Spira mirabilis" [http://www.e-cart.ro/ec-6/ileana/uk/g/ileana_uk.html]
 +
* Alexandra Titu, "Experimentalism in Romanian Art after 1960" (2003) [http://www.c3.hu/ican.artnet.org/ican/textc074.html?id_text=24]
 +
* Erwin Kessler, "Making Art by Numbers" [http://www.plural-magazine.com/article_making_art_by_numbers.html]

Revision as of 20:30, 10 February 2009

The Sigma Group was the first experimental group in Romania (1970-1978), made up of its permanent members: Stefan Bertalan, Constantin Flondor and Doru Tulcan. Their programme was both artistic and pedagogic; at the time its members were all teachers at the Fine Arts Academy in Timisoara. Their activities focussed on a free, experimental study of nature integrated with an ecological vision, and were characterised by an interest in land art. The group presented actions, film and photography, in an attempt to integrate several "visual languages" in their research. [1]


In 1970, Stefan Bertalan together with Constantin Flondor laid the foundation for a new art group, Sigma group, when more young artists joined them, who they were all teaching at the Art High school in Timisoara (Doru Tulcan, Elisei Rusu, Ion Gaita and the mathematician Lucian Codreanu).

A defining characteristic of this new group was the declared program of work, based on the principle of team and interdisciplinary work (mathematics, cybernetics, bionics, but also plastic structures). The first creation period of Sigma group (1970-1974) is characterised by projects made in common, visible also in the system of participation in exhibitions. One example of such a project was "The Informational Tower", conceived in 1970, mixing architecture and sculpture, exhibited information within a show of light and sound. But not only the public projects, as the geometric structure realized in 1971 for the hallway of the Students' House in Timisoara or the project of fountain which brought them an U.A.P. prize, have marked the important moments of the group's development; a new vision upon their subsequent evolution was to be marked by the action and the environment called "bloating structures" and realized at the Bastion Gallery in Timisoara, for the UNESCO Plastic Arts' Week. In the Bastion Gallery the rooms have been organized with bloating structures in the form of transparent tubes, onto which, during the opening, a dia and film projection took place. Thus, the spatial environment took the form of a happening with public assistance. In the same year, Bertalan, Flondor and Tulcan were invited to participate in the exhibition "Art and Energy" in Bucharest, where they created spatial installations which were separate but at the same time within a unitary ensemble that carried the unmistakable mark of the group. The last big common action of the group before they separated was "Multi-vision" (presented at the exhibition "Study 1", Timisoara, 1978), a spatial environment formed by a tri-dimensional structure made of coloured semi-transparent nets, spatially arranged in the form of a tetrahedron, onto which there was a projection of black and white and colour film for two cameras.

Source: Ileana Pintilie, "Spira mirabilis" [2]


By the early seventies, the most representative movements of making

"art by numbers" in Romania were the "sigma" group in Timisoara (Constantin Flondor, Stefan Bertalan, Roman Cotosman and Doru Tulcan) and Kinema Ikon, the circle of experimental film in Arad led by Ovidiu Sabäu. The first was intimately connected to a neo-con- structivist (Bauhaus-like) practice both in creation and teaching, while the second was a rather structuralist-borne implant in experimental film-making. Although "sigma" was very well-known and held in high esteem (even by the political establishment of the time), where- as Kinemalkon was barely known at all, pursuing its research in a rather silent if not hidden manner, both groups shared, in the words of one of the "sigma" manifestoes, "the reconsideration of the environ- ment as an object of artistic research" and they aimed, manifestly, at the development of an "intelligence able to adapt them to a future cul- ture" inescapably marked by "the development of an algorithmic cul- ture". Structures, frames, schemes, recurrent invariants, technical manipulation, calculation, repetition and scientific-like insight were the main marks of their aesthetic outlook. "Organizational" and meliorist, positivist and centripetal, highly "humanistic" in a contem- porary sense, such artistic endeavors are nonetheless stamped by that profoundly Utopian drive of the historical avant-garde. Their unex- pressed goal was to regain a certain, "alternative transcendence" for our times, one that was believed to be controllable, science-based,

computational, and eventually thoroughly intelligible.

Source: Erwin Kessler, "Making Art by Numbers" [3]


Articles
  • Ileana Pintilie, "Spira mirabilis" [4]
  • Alexandra Titu, "Experimentalism in Romanian Art after 1960" (2003) [5]
  • Erwin Kessler, "Making Art by Numbers" [6]