Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Monoskop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
''the former Monoskop geo discourse was targeted to CE+EE territory, after the discussion, the geo was widened to Europa. talk to this subject not over, there is much more to answer.''
 
''the former Monoskop geo discourse was targeted to CE+EE territory, after the discussion, the geo was widened to Europa. talk to this subject not over, there is much more to answer.''
  
why not define the context by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media. --[[User:Dusan]], 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)
+
why not define the context by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media. --[[User:Dusan|Dusan]], 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  
:just europa (geographically), and changing perception and expressivity,  
+
:just europa (geographically), and changing perception and expressivity, no? --[[User:XGZ|XGZ]] 20:02, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)
no? --[[User:XGZ]] 20:02, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)
 
  
hm, central+east europe vs rest of the world outdated discussion? what have i been doing all that time? hibernating? missed the paradigm update. come back to 90s and send me the link to upgrade me, possible? sth to read. how did it all happened? east/west 0's&1's media discourse. any good references? --[[User:Dusan]], 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
+
hm, central+east europe vs rest of the world outdated discussion? what have i been doing all that time? hibernating? missed the paradigm update. come back to 90s and send me the link to upgrade me, possible? sth to read. how did it all happened? east/west 0's&1's media discourse. any good references? --[[User:Dusan|Dusan]], 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  
:whellllllllllll  started reading: balkan as a metaphor (between globalization and fragmentation) by dusan bjelic and obrad savic, mit press 2002 --[[User:XGZ]] 19:38, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
+
:whellllllllllll  started reading: balkan as a metaphor (between globalization and fragmentation) by dusan bjelic and obrad savic, mit press 2002 --[[User:XGZ|XGZ]] 19:38, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  
 
::outdated discussion - have the same feeling  
 
::outdated discussion - have the same feeling  
- too many times built border between west and east by discussing and  
+
::- too many times built border between west and east by discussing and  
 
mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions  
 
mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions  
 
where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those  
 
where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those  
 
countries were together in socialistic block  
 
countries were together in socialistic block  
- today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined  
+
::- today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined  
 
culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies /  
 
culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies /  
 
subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds  
 
subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds  
- central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital  
+
::- central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital  
 
media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same  
 
media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same  
 
time to west then us  
 
time to west then us  
- the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic  
+
::- the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic  
 
talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative  
 
talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative  
 
but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...)  
 
but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...)  
--[[User:Marisa]] 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST)
+
--[[User:Marisa|Marisa]] 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST)

Revision as of 15:49, 6 August 2004

we can speak about monoskop here.

central + east europe geography

the former Monoskop geo discourse was targeted to CE+EE territory, after the discussion, the geo was widened to Europa. talk to this subject not over, there is much more to answer.

why not define the context by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media. --Dusan, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)

just europa (geographically), and changing perception and expressivity, no? --XGZ 20:02, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)

hm, central+east europe vs rest of the world outdated discussion? what have i been doing all that time? hibernating? missed the paradigm update. come back to 90s and send me the link to upgrade me, possible? sth to read. how did it all happened? east/west 0's&1's media discourse. any good references? --Dusan, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)

whellllllllllll started reading: balkan as a metaphor (between globalization and fragmentation) by dusan bjelic and obrad savic, mit press 2002 --XGZ 19:38, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
outdated discussion - have the same feeling
- too many times built border between west and east by discussing and

mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those countries were together in socialistic block

- today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined

culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies / subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds

- central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital

media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same time to west then us

- the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic

talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...) --Marisa 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST)