Difference between revisions of "Voldemārs Matvejs"

From Monoskop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Born 1877 in Riga. Died 1914 in St Petersburg. Latvian artist and theorist, active in Russia. He trained at the Riga art school of Benjamin Blum (1861–1949) before moving to St...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Born 1877 in Riga. Died 1914 in St Petersburg. Latvian artist and theorist, active in Russia. He trained at the Riga art school of Benjamin Blum (1861–1949) before moving to St Petersburg and entering the Academy of Arts in 1906. As the principal spokesman for the St Petersburg art society, the Union of Youth (1910–14), he published articles defending the group’s artistic experiments, organized its early exhibitions and travelled to western Europe to establish links with the German and French avant-garde. In 1910 his programme for the re-examination of the formal principles of art was manifested in two Union of Youth exhibitions in St Petersburg and Riga and in his article on the 'Russian Secession'. He explored the move from Symbolist-Impressionism to Neo-primitivism and the overlap between them, and indicated the continuing emphasis on spiritual content in Russian art combined with the call for a new social and cultural awareness. His article on the principles of the new art (1912) and his book on artistry (1914) recommend an intuitive, subjective approach to art invoked through empathy and altered states of consciousness. Such a position provided a theoretical basis for the new developments in the art of [[Kazimir Malevich|Malevich]], [[Pavel Filonov|Filonov]], [[Olga Rozanova|Rozanova]] and [[Mikhail Larionov|Larionov]] (Cubo-Futurism, analytical art and Rayism), as well as the [[zaum]] ('transrational') aesthetic promoted by [[Aleksey Kruchonykh|Kruchonykh]]. Markov's last essays—which included analyses of Chinese poetry, Easter island sculpture and African art—were grounded in his attempt to redefine the principles of beauty and to re-establish the essential relationship, lost in the alienated world of the Russian art establishment, between modern artists and the world they perceived and experienced; here he concentrated more on plastic and literary principles, analysing creative form from the viewpoint of material conditions and the artist’s psyche.
+
Also Vladimir Ivanovich Markov; Voldemar Janovič Matvej; Hans Waldemars Yanov Matvejs; Valdemars Matvejs; Voldemārs Matvejs. Born 1877 in Riga. Died 1914 in St Petersburg. Latvian artist and theorist, active in Russia. He trained at the Riga art school of Benjamin Blum (1861–1949) before moving to St Petersburg and entering the Academy of Arts in 1906. As the principal spokesman for the St Petersburg art society, the Union of Youth (1910–14), he published articles defending the group’s artistic experiments, organized its early exhibitions and travelled to western Europe to establish links with the German and French avant-garde. In 1910 his programme for the re-examination of the formal principles of art was manifested in two Union of Youth exhibitions in St Petersburg and Riga and in his article on the 'Russian Secession'. He explored the move from Symbolist-Impressionism to Neo-primitivism and the overlap between them, and indicated the continuing emphasis on spiritual content in Russian art combined with the call for a new social and cultural awareness. His article on the principles of the new art (1912) and his book on artistry (1914) recommend an intuitive, subjective approach to art invoked through empathy and altered states of consciousness. Such a position provided a theoretical basis for the new developments in the art of [[Kazimir Malevich|Malevich]], [[Pavel Filonov|Filonov]], [[Olga Rozanova|Rozanova]] and [[Mikhail Larionov|Larionov]] (Cubo-Futurism, analytical art and Rayism), as well as the [[zaum]] ('transrational') aesthetic promoted by [[Aleksey Kruchonykh|Kruchonykh]]. Markov's last essays—which included analyses of Chinese poetry, Easter island sculpture and African art—were grounded in his attempt to redefine the principles of beauty and to re-establish the essential relationship, lost in the alienated world of the Russian art establishment, between modern artists and the world they perceived and experienced; here he concentrated more on plastic and literary principles, analysing creative form from the viewpoint of material conditions and the artist’s psyche.

Revision as of 14:06, 4 November 2011

Also Vladimir Ivanovich Markov; Voldemar Janovič Matvej; Hans Waldemars Yanov Matvejs; Valdemars Matvejs; Voldemārs Matvejs. Born 1877 in Riga. Died 1914 in St Petersburg. Latvian artist and theorist, active in Russia. He trained at the Riga art school of Benjamin Blum (1861–1949) before moving to St Petersburg and entering the Academy of Arts in 1906. As the principal spokesman for the St Petersburg art society, the Union of Youth (1910–14), he published articles defending the group’s artistic experiments, organized its early exhibitions and travelled to western Europe to establish links with the German and French avant-garde. In 1910 his programme for the re-examination of the formal principles of art was manifested in two Union of Youth exhibitions in St Petersburg and Riga and in his article on the 'Russian Secession'. He explored the move from Symbolist-Impressionism to Neo-primitivism and the overlap between them, and indicated the continuing emphasis on spiritual content in Russian art combined with the call for a new social and cultural awareness. His article on the principles of the new art (1912) and his book on artistry (1914) recommend an intuitive, subjective approach to art invoked through empathy and altered states of consciousness. Such a position provided a theoretical basis for the new developments in the art of Malevich, Filonov, Rozanova and Larionov (Cubo-Futurism, analytical art and Rayism), as well as the zaum ('transrational') aesthetic promoted by Kruchonykh. Markov's last essays—which included analyses of Chinese poetry, Easter island sculpture and African art—were grounded in his attempt to redefine the principles of beauty and to re-establish the essential relationship, lost in the alienated world of the Russian art establishment, between modern artists and the world they perceived and experienced; here he concentrated more on plastic and literary principles, analysing creative form from the viewpoint of material conditions and the artist’s psyche.