Difference between revisions of "User:Nanaumes"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[File:Mouse jpg.jpeg|100px|thumb|check out this picture by Thando]] | [[File:Mouse jpg.jpeg|100px|thumb|check out this picture by Thando]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==gallery== | ||
<gallery mode=packed heights=50px> | <gallery mode=packed heights=50px> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 41: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | <div class= | + | ==text== |
| − | + | ===the problem with work=== | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | <div class=fourcol> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | By folowing the worker not only from arketplace to workplace, but also from the place of employment to the domestic space,wefindevi- dencenotonlyofclashierarchy,butofspecificalygenderedformsof exploitationandpaternsofinequality.Bydescendingintotheeven morehiden,evenmorefiercelyprivatizedspaceofthehousehold,we semenandwomenwhomaybeformalyequalunderthelawtrans- formedthroughthegenderdivisionoflaborintorelativelyprivileged andpenalizedsubjects. | |
| − | + | Thus,Marxistfeministsinthe1970Sexploredthe meansbywhichgenderhierarchiesdeliverunwagedwomenworkersto thedomesticmodeofreproductionwhilealsoensuringacheaperand moreflexiblesecondaryortertiarywagedlaborforce.Thesefeminists debatedtheexactvaluetocapitalofwomen'sunwageddomesticlabor andexposedthehyperexploitationofwomenwageearnersaroundthe globe.Andtheystudiedtheinterconectionsamongthefamily,the labormarket,wagedandunwagedlaborproceses,andthewelfarestate. Aswewilse,infact,manyoftheirinsightsintotheconditionsof women'slaborunderFordismwilprovetobemorewidelyaplicableto theformsofworktypicalofpost-Fordisteconomies.Byextendingthese efortstopublicize,politicize,andtransformworkintothefieldofdo- mesticlabor,feministsusefulycomplicatedandupedtheanteofal threprojects.Whatmighthaveatfirstapearedtobeasimpleadition toMarxistanalyseshasinfactrequiredavastrethinkingofitsconcepts andmodels,itscriticalanalysesandutopianvisions. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | __notoc__ | ||
Revision as of 15:41, 28 October 2025
bold
- ♪
- ♪
- ♪
gallery
1
2
3
video
text
the problem with work
By folowing the worker not only from arketplace to workplace, but also from the place of employment to the domestic space,wefindevi- dencenotonlyofclashierarchy,butofspecificalygenderedformsof exploitationandpaternsofinequality.Bydescendingintotheeven morehiden,evenmorefiercelyprivatizedspaceofthehousehold,we semenandwomenwhomaybeformalyequalunderthelawtrans- formedthroughthegenderdivisionoflaborintorelativelyprivileged andpenalizedsubjects. Thus,Marxistfeministsinthe1970Sexploredthe meansbywhichgenderhierarchiesdeliverunwagedwomenworkersto thedomesticmodeofreproductionwhilealsoensuringacheaperand moreflexiblesecondaryortertiarywagedlaborforce.Thesefeminists debatedtheexactvaluetocapitalofwomen'sunwageddomesticlabor andexposedthehyperexploitationofwomenwageearnersaroundthe globe.Andtheystudiedtheinterconectionsamongthefamily,the labormarket,wagedandunwagedlaborproceses,andthewelfarestate. Aswewilse,infact,manyoftheirinsightsintotheconditionsof women'slaborunderFordismwilprovetobemorewidelyaplicableto theformsofworktypicalofpost-Fordisteconomies.Byextendingthese efortstopublicize,politicize,andtransformworkintothefieldofdo- mesticlabor,feministsusefulycomplicatedandupedtheanteofal threprojects.Whatmighthaveatfirstapearedtobeasimpleadition toMarxistanalyseshasinfactrequiredavastrethinkingofitsconcepts andmodels,itscriticalanalysesandutopianvisions.
