Difference between revisions of "Book"
(New page: '''MONOSKOP<br> Art, culture and technology in Central and Eastern Europe''' == Content structure idea == we are working with four sections, roughly ordered by time: I. historical pers...) |
|||
(61 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | '''MONOSKOP<br> | + | '''MONOSKOP'''<br> |
− | Art, culture and technology in Central | + | '''Art, culture and technology in East-Central Europe''' |
+ | <blockquote>"''You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.''" (Buckminster Fuller)</blockquote> | ||
− | + | MONOSKOP book project examines the social context of historical developments in media arts in East-Central Europe. Analysis of sociopoetic conditions of art and technology crossings from 1960s to 2000s draws upon the undertakings in experimental and avantgarde film, performance art, computer art, video art, experimental music, sound art, and media theory. The objective is to create an educational material for students and educators across media art and culture departments, as well as a reference network for theoreticians and critics to assist them in development of the theoretical discourse on new media art in the East-Central Europe. | |
− | + | = Content structure idea = | |
− | + | ; Short remarks: | |
− | and | + | * Geographical issue - should Russia/Soviet Union be included? |
− | + | * Not to forgot the role and influence of Soros network - active in C/E since mid-80s (C3, Jeleni, Ex Oriente Lux, Butterfly Effect, computer donations to Soros centres, etc). | |
− | + | * Don't forget about collaboration and artist groups. | |
− | artist | + | * Admit "historical distance" - it's hard to write about the current decade. |
− | + | * Hook up study of media art with local (art/cultural) development. | |
− | + | ; The aim of the publication is threefold: | |
− | + | * Present the major events in the development and historical achievements of media art in c/e Europe. | |
− | of | + | * Analyse pioneering experimental works via theoretical texts, interviews, artist writings, programmatic texts |
− | + | * Examine media art | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | The sections are as follows: | |
− | + | * Introduction | |
− | + | * I. Timeline of major events | |
− | + | * II. Pioneers | |
− | + | * III. Conclusion | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | = Contents = | ||
+ | ==Preface== | ||
+ | ==Introduction== | ||
− | + | We need good introduction into politics, concepts, to contextualise | |
+ | the field. | ||
− | + | Idea is not to write a comprehensive history, rather | |
+ | to point out the works and concepts that may not be skipped | ||
+ | in the writing of art histories. | ||
+ | The selection is eclectic. | ||
+ | It's not academic textbook, but directed to general public. | ||
− | === | + | Ref: Latour? (hybrids) |
− | + | ||
− | + | ===East-Central Europe=== | |
− | === | + | |
− | + | Visegrad + Baltic + Balkan countries | |
− | + | ||
− | + | Ref: Staniszkis, Štrauss, Piotrowski | |
− | + | ||
− | + | Outline: [[East-Central Europe]] | |
− | ==== | + | |
− | + | Readlist: | |
− | + | * [http://www.vaclavhavel.cz/showtrans.php?cat=clanky&val=72_aj_clanky.html&typ=HTML Havel (1978) - The Power of the Powerless] [http://www.vaclavhavel.cz/showtrans.php?cat=eseje&val=2_eseje.html&typ=HTML (Czech)] | |
− | + | * [http://web.archive.org/web/20021213085125/http://www.aspectspositions.org/essays/hegyi1.html Hégyi (2001) - Central Europe as a Hypothesis and a Way of Life] | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ===Media art=== | |
− | ==== | + | |
− | + | Ref: Penny, Manovich, Wilson | |
− | + | ||
− | + | Outline: [[Media art]] | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ===Media art in CEE=== | |
− | + | Outline: [[Media art in CEE]] | |
− | ==== | + | |
− | + | ===Locality=== | |
− | + | Ref: Appadurai, Agamben?, Grzinic?, Štrauss? | |
− | === | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ==I. Timeline== | |
− | Edward Ihnatowicz: Portrait of the Artist as an Engineer (1988). synopsis from unpublished book about “how an artist become involved in high technology”. | + | |
− | + | Format: short descriptions of major art-related events and phenomena: | |
− | ====(?) | + | exhibitions, conferences, workshops, publications, journals, |
+ | video-journals, foundations of art departments, technological | ||
+ | inventions, art servers, etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ask artists, curators, organisers, theoreticians, engineers | ||
+ | from each c/e european country to propose up to 10 major events | ||
+ | from local media art history. Then scrutinize the answers and | ||
+ | then mutually agree (board members) how to proceed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Chronology may be visualised as the visual map. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==II. Pioneers== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Idea for this section is to present the particular pioneering | ||
+ | experimental works, covering the spectrum of artistic forms, | ||
+ | historical periods, and geographical regions. It is important | ||
+ | to research the various disciplines re what to include, what are | ||
+ | the connections, how are they linked to each other etc., | ||
+ | how the collaborations were established and accomodated. | ||
+ | These works and contexts may be analysed as case-studies | ||
+ | via theoretical texts, interviews, oral histories, artist writings, | ||
+ | programmatic texts, etc. Have local people writing about pioneers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each section should contain at least two articles - one covering | ||
+ | art criticism, another the technical background of the works. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sections: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vladimir Bonacic [dynamic objects; 1960s; CR; M]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Still in the 1960s, Croatian Zagreb, at the corner of socialist | ||
+ | modernist Yugoslavia, was the site of the world's state-of-the-art | ||
+ | manifestations of computer art. Series of New Tendencies exhibitions | ||
+ | and conferences hosted artists and scientists discussing the common | ||
+ | grounds for collaborations backed up by theories of the information | ||
+ | aesthetics. Among many, programmed sculptures and dynamic objects | ||
+ | by cybernetic artist Vladimir Bonacic proposed richly diverse | ||
+ | directions for art and technology investigations. | ||
+ | This Zagreb-based cybernetician exhibited a total of 17 works during | ||
+ | New Tendencies 4 exhibitions in Zagreb in 1968/69. He used custom-made | ||
+ | hardware for developing the “dynamic objects”. His work can be | ||
+ | interpreted as a pioneering use of interactivity in computer-based | ||
+ | artworks. He was critical of using computer as a tool for simulation | ||
+ | of what already exists. | ||
+ | * article 1 & 2: by Darko Fritz, [http://darkofritz.net/text/LEON4102_pp175-183.pdf] and/or [http://darkofritz.net/text/Fritz.NT_oris%2054.pdf] | ||
+ | * ref: Miro Cmerman (programmed Bonacic's works, lives in Berlin) | ||
+ | * ref: Fritz about Bonacic, http://darkofritz.net/text/bonacic.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Edward Ihnatowitz [robotic art; 1960s-70s; PL/UK; M]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Polish cybernetic Sculptor (1940-50s lived in UK), active in the | ||
+ | late 1960's and early 1970's. His ground-breaking sculptures explored | ||
+ | the interaction between his robotic works and the audience, | ||
+ | and reached their height with The Senster, a large (15 feet long), | ||
+ | hydraulic robot commissioned by the electronics giant, Philips, | ||
+ | for their permanent showplace, the Evolution, in Eindhoven in 1970. | ||
+ | The sculpture used sound and movement sensors to react to the | ||
+ | behaviour of the visitors. It was one of the first computer controlled | ||
+ | interactive robotic works of art. | ||
+ | * article 1: Joanna Walewska, art criticism | ||
+ | * article 2: Alex Zivanovic, about technical background of EI's work | ||
+ | * ref: http://www.senster.com/ihnatowicz/ | ||
+ | * ref: Peter Beyls (he did PhD on Ihnatowicz and attended New Tendencies) | ||
+ | * ref: Edward Ihnatowicz: Portrait of the Artist as an Engineer (1988). synopsis from unpublished book about “how an artist become involved in high technology”. http://www.senster.com/ihnatowicz/articles/artist_as_engineer.pdf | ||
+ | * ref: Edward Ihnatowicz: Towards a Thinking Machine (1975), http://www.senster.com/ihnatowicz/articles/towards_thinking.pdf | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Experimental studio in Pilsen and/or Bratislava [electroacoustic music; 1960s-70s; CS; M]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ref: Juraj Duris | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Gabor Body and Infermental magazine [video art; 1970s-80s; HU; M] === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Body graduated first from philosophy and later became an internationally | ||
+ | known film and video maker. Established various experimental and | ||
+ | avantgarde projects at BBS including the Film Language Series in 1973 | ||
+ | and the K/3 experimental film group in 1976. Producing his first | ||
+ | video in 1976 was the first person in Hungary to work in this medium | ||
+ | in an artistic context. | ||
+ | Infermental, Body's annually edited international video series was | ||
+ | widely hailed as "the art magazine" of the eighties. Collecting and | ||
+ | collating the work of people working in remote global locations, | ||
+ | uniquely bridged the information gap till the new communication forms | ||
+ | appeared. The series published featured a range of guest editors | ||
+ | and in total included work from over 1500 artists from 36 countries | ||
+ | and was published up to 1991. | ||
+ | * article 1: selected by Nina Czegledy from one of Body's books, has to be translated from Hungarian | ||
+ | * ref: http://burundi.sk/monoskop/index.php/Gabor_Body | ||
+ | * ref: http://burundi.sk/monoskop/index.php/Infermental | ||
+ | * ref: Vera Body (Gabor Body's ex-wife) | ||
+ | * ref: Nina has 4 books on Body in Hungarian | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Kinema Ikon group [experimental film; 1970s-80s; RO; M]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ref: Raluca Velusar (curated Kinema Ikon exhibition in Bucharest few years ago) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vuk Cosic [internet art; 1990s; SL; M]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ref: Vuk Cosic | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===RT-32 [electromagnetism and sound art; 2000s; LV; MF]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Xchange net.radio network held an international symposium for sound | ||
+ | art, radio and satellite technologies in August 2001 in the forests | ||
+ | of western Latvia in Irbene at the site of Soviet-era d=32 meter | ||
+ | dish antenna. Formerly used to spy on satellite transmissions | ||
+ | between Europe and North-America by the KGB, the antenna was | ||
+ | abandoned and nearly destroyed when the Russian Army departed | ||
+ | in 1994. The dish was successfully repaired by VIRAC (Ventspils | ||
+ | International Radio Astronomy Center) radio astronomers. | ||
+ | Over the days of the symposium international team of about 30 sound | ||
+ | artists, net and community radio activists and radio amateurs | ||
+ | in co-operation with VIRAC scientists were exploring the possibilities | ||
+ | of antenna: dish was used as a massive parabolic microphone to scan | ||
+ | the surrounding environment; for snooping, monitoring and recording | ||
+ | the satellites, mobile networks, and air traffic control signals; | ||
+ | and also for scanning the celestial bodies.The recorded data were | ||
+ | then processed by participating artists. (Publication and two DVDs | ||
+ | were published.) | ||
+ | * ref: http://rixc.lv/reader/txt/txt.php?id=320&l=en | ||
+ | * ref: Ewen Chardronet (French sound artist, particip @Irbene) | ||
+ | * ref: Acoustic Space | ||
+ | * ref: Radioqualia | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | still to check for this section: | ||
+ | * DDR? (consult Golo Foellmer) | ||
+ | * Bulgaria? (consult Ludazar Boyadev) | ||
+ | * East Germany? (consult Stephen Kovats who did Ostranenie) | ||
+ | * Walitsky? (Polish sound artist) | ||
+ | * Nettime? (consult Pit Schultz) | ||
+ | * audiovisual performances? | ||
+ | * media art and activism? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==III. Conclusion== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We discussed that maybe it is not the best idea to attempt to build | ||
+ | up the theory of media art within this book. Book should rather serve | ||
+ | as the ground for such endeavors to be taken later. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Final chapter may offer the conclusion of the research, and we can | ||
+ | invite one or more theoreticians for contribution(s). So far we thought | ||
+ | about Tomas Pospiszyl (Czech art historian living in Prague), | ||
+ | Bojana Pejic (Serbian art theoretician living in Berlin), | ||
+ | Armin Medosch (Austrian writer on media art living in London), | ||
+ | and Zoran Pantelic (Serbian artist and educator living in Novi Sad). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | = Older versions and further research = | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Collaborative research on media art and culture in Central and Eastern Europe]] | ||
+ | * [[Book (2)]] | ||
+ | * [[Book (3)]] | ||
+ | * [[Book (4)]] | ||
+ | * [[Book (5)]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Editorial board= | ||
+ | |||
+ | Please feel free to contact us. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Dušan Barok]], db at societyofalgorithm dot org | ||
+ | * [[Barbora Šedivá]], babuta at 34 dot sk | ||
+ | * [[Guy van Belle]], xgz at societyofalgorithm dot org | ||
+ | * [[Nina Czegledy]], czegledy at interlog dot com | ||
+ | * [[Lenka Dolanová]], lenka.dol at gmail dot com | ||
+ | * [[Eva Krátká]], eva.kratka at avu dot cz | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Contact= | ||
+ | |||
+ | Coordination: Dusan Barok, db at societyofalgorithm dot org<br> | ||
+ | Wiki: http://www.burundi.sk/monoskop/<Br> | ||
+ | Delicious: http://del.icio.us/tag/monoskop<br> | ||
+ | Supported by Col-me, Bratislava, http://www.col-me.info, http://col-me.info/sk/node/13<Br> | ||
+ | Partner: Wyspa Institute Of Art, Gdansk, http://www.wyspa.art.pl/<br> | ||
+ | Partner: Nina Czegledy, Budapest<br> | ||
+ | Partner: Mlok Association, Prague, http://mlok-org.net<br> | ||
+ | Supported by ERSTE Foundation, http://www.erstestiftung.org<br> | ||
+ | Supported by International Visegrad Fund, http://www.visegradfund.org<br> | ||
+ | Supported by Academy of Arts, Banská Bystrica, http://www.aku.sk | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Erstestiftung.gif|162px]] [[Image:Logo_ivf.png|180px]] |
Latest revision as of 12:59, 15 July 2011
MONOSKOP
Art, culture and technology in East-Central Europe
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." (Buckminster Fuller)
MONOSKOP book project examines the social context of historical developments in media arts in East-Central Europe. Analysis of sociopoetic conditions of art and technology crossings from 1960s to 2000s draws upon the undertakings in experimental and avantgarde film, performance art, computer art, video art, experimental music, sound art, and media theory. The objective is to create an educational material for students and educators across media art and culture departments, as well as a reference network for theoreticians and critics to assist them in development of the theoretical discourse on new media art in the East-Central Europe.
Contents
- 1 Content structure idea
- 2 Contents
- 2.1 Preface
- 2.2 Introduction
- 2.3 I. Timeline
- 2.4 II. Pioneers
- 2.4.1 Vladimir Bonacic [dynamic objects; 1960s; CR; M]
- 2.4.2 Edward Ihnatowitz [robotic art; 1960s-70s; PL/UK; M]
- 2.4.3 Experimental studio in Pilsen and/or Bratislava [electroacoustic music; 1960s-70s; CS; M]
- 2.4.4 Gabor Body and Infermental magazine [video art; 1970s-80s; HU; M]
- 2.4.5 Kinema Ikon group [experimental film; 1970s-80s; RO; M]
- 2.4.6 Vuk Cosic [internet art; 1990s; SL; M]
- 2.4.7 RT-32 [electromagnetism and sound art; 2000s; LV; MF]
- 2.5 III. Conclusion
- 3 Older versions and further research
- 4 Editorial board
- 5 Contact
Content structure idea
- Short remarks
- Geographical issue - should Russia/Soviet Union be included?
- Not to forgot the role and influence of Soros network - active in C/E since mid-80s (C3, Jeleni, Ex Oriente Lux, Butterfly Effect, computer donations to Soros centres, etc).
- Don't forget about collaboration and artist groups.
- Admit "historical distance" - it's hard to write about the current decade.
- Hook up study of media art with local (art/cultural) development.
- The aim of the publication is threefold
- Present the major events in the development and historical achievements of media art in c/e Europe.
- Analyse pioneering experimental works via theoretical texts, interviews, artist writings, programmatic texts
- Examine media art
The sections are as follows:
- Introduction
- I. Timeline of major events
- II. Pioneers
- III. Conclusion
Contents
Preface
Introduction
We need good introduction into politics, concepts, to contextualise the field.
Idea is not to write a comprehensive history, rather to point out the works and concepts that may not be skipped in the writing of art histories.
The selection is eclectic. It's not academic textbook, but directed to general public.
Ref: Latour? (hybrids)
East-Central Europe
Visegrad + Baltic + Balkan countries
Ref: Staniszkis, Štrauss, Piotrowski
Outline: East-Central Europe
Readlist:
- Havel (1978) - The Power of the Powerless (Czech)
- Hégyi (2001) - Central Europe as a Hypothesis and a Way of Life
Media art
Ref: Penny, Manovich, Wilson
Outline: Media art
Media art in CEE
Outline: Media art in CEE
Locality
Ref: Appadurai, Agamben?, Grzinic?, Štrauss?
I. Timeline
Format: short descriptions of major art-related events and phenomena: exhibitions, conferences, workshops, publications, journals, video-journals, foundations of art departments, technological inventions, art servers, etc.
Ask artists, curators, organisers, theoreticians, engineers from each c/e european country to propose up to 10 major events from local media art history. Then scrutinize the answers and then mutually agree (board members) how to proceed.
Chronology may be visualised as the visual map.
II. Pioneers
Idea for this section is to present the particular pioneering experimental works, covering the spectrum of artistic forms, historical periods, and geographical regions. It is important to research the various disciplines re what to include, what are the connections, how are they linked to each other etc., how the collaborations were established and accomodated. These works and contexts may be analysed as case-studies via theoretical texts, interviews, oral histories, artist writings, programmatic texts, etc. Have local people writing about pioneers.
Each section should contain at least two articles - one covering art criticism, another the technical background of the works.
Sections:
Vladimir Bonacic [dynamic objects; 1960s; CR; M]
Still in the 1960s, Croatian Zagreb, at the corner of socialist modernist Yugoslavia, was the site of the world's state-of-the-art manifestations of computer art. Series of New Tendencies exhibitions and conferences hosted artists and scientists discussing the common grounds for collaborations backed up by theories of the information aesthetics. Among many, programmed sculptures and dynamic objects by cybernetic artist Vladimir Bonacic proposed richly diverse directions for art and technology investigations. This Zagreb-based cybernetician exhibited a total of 17 works during New Tendencies 4 exhibitions in Zagreb in 1968/69. He used custom-made hardware for developing the “dynamic objects”. His work can be interpreted as a pioneering use of interactivity in computer-based artworks. He was critical of using computer as a tool for simulation of what already exists.
- article 1 & 2: by Darko Fritz, [1] and/or [2]
- ref: Miro Cmerman (programmed Bonacic's works, lives in Berlin)
- ref: Fritz about Bonacic, http://darkofritz.net/text/bonacic.html
Edward Ihnatowitz [robotic art; 1960s-70s; PL/UK; M]
Polish cybernetic Sculptor (1940-50s lived in UK), active in the late 1960's and early 1970's. His ground-breaking sculptures explored the interaction between his robotic works and the audience, and reached their height with The Senster, a large (15 feet long), hydraulic robot commissioned by the electronics giant, Philips, for their permanent showplace, the Evolution, in Eindhoven in 1970. The sculpture used sound and movement sensors to react to the behaviour of the visitors. It was one of the first computer controlled interactive robotic works of art.
- article 1: Joanna Walewska, art criticism
- article 2: Alex Zivanovic, about technical background of EI's work
- ref: http://www.senster.com/ihnatowicz/
- ref: Peter Beyls (he did PhD on Ihnatowicz and attended New Tendencies)
- ref: Edward Ihnatowicz: Portrait of the Artist as an Engineer (1988). synopsis from unpublished book about “how an artist become involved in high technology”. http://www.senster.com/ihnatowicz/articles/artist_as_engineer.pdf
- ref: Edward Ihnatowicz: Towards a Thinking Machine (1975), http://www.senster.com/ihnatowicz/articles/towards_thinking.pdf
Experimental studio in Pilsen and/or Bratislava [electroacoustic music; 1960s-70s; CS; M]
- ref: Juraj Duris
Gabor Body and Infermental magazine [video art; 1970s-80s; HU; M]
Body graduated first from philosophy and later became an internationally known film and video maker. Established various experimental and avantgarde projects at BBS including the Film Language Series in 1973 and the K/3 experimental film group in 1976. Producing his first video in 1976 was the first person in Hungary to work in this medium in an artistic context. Infermental, Body's annually edited international video series was widely hailed as "the art magazine" of the eighties. Collecting and collating the work of people working in remote global locations, uniquely bridged the information gap till the new communication forms appeared. The series published featured a range of guest editors and in total included work from over 1500 artists from 36 countries and was published up to 1991.
- article 1: selected by Nina Czegledy from one of Body's books, has to be translated from Hungarian
- ref: http://burundi.sk/monoskop/index.php/Gabor_Body
- ref: http://burundi.sk/monoskop/index.php/Infermental
- ref: Vera Body (Gabor Body's ex-wife)
- ref: Nina has 4 books on Body in Hungarian
Kinema Ikon group [experimental film; 1970s-80s; RO; M]
- ref: Raluca Velusar (curated Kinema Ikon exhibition in Bucharest few years ago)
Vuk Cosic [internet art; 1990s; SL; M]
- ref: Vuk Cosic
RT-32 [electromagnetism and sound art; 2000s; LV; MF]
Xchange net.radio network held an international symposium for sound art, radio and satellite technologies in August 2001 in the forests of western Latvia in Irbene at the site of Soviet-era d=32 meter dish antenna. Formerly used to spy on satellite transmissions between Europe and North-America by the KGB, the antenna was abandoned and nearly destroyed when the Russian Army departed in 1994. The dish was successfully repaired by VIRAC (Ventspils International Radio Astronomy Center) radio astronomers. Over the days of the symposium international team of about 30 sound artists, net and community radio activists and radio amateurs in co-operation with VIRAC scientists were exploring the possibilities of antenna: dish was used as a massive parabolic microphone to scan the surrounding environment; for snooping, monitoring and recording the satellites, mobile networks, and air traffic control signals; and also for scanning the celestial bodies.The recorded data were then processed by participating artists. (Publication and two DVDs were published.)
- ref: http://rixc.lv/reader/txt/txt.php?id=320&l=en
- ref: Ewen Chardronet (French sound artist, particip @Irbene)
- ref: Acoustic Space
- ref: Radioqualia
still to check for this section:
- DDR? (consult Golo Foellmer)
- Bulgaria? (consult Ludazar Boyadev)
- East Germany? (consult Stephen Kovats who did Ostranenie)
- Walitsky? (Polish sound artist)
- Nettime? (consult Pit Schultz)
- audiovisual performances?
- media art and activism?
III. Conclusion
We discussed that maybe it is not the best idea to attempt to build up the theory of media art within this book. Book should rather serve as the ground for such endeavors to be taken later.
Final chapter may offer the conclusion of the research, and we can invite one or more theoreticians for contribution(s). So far we thought about Tomas Pospiszyl (Czech art historian living in Prague), Bojana Pejic (Serbian art theoretician living in Berlin), Armin Medosch (Austrian writer on media art living in London), and Zoran Pantelic (Serbian artist and educator living in Novi Sad).
Older versions and further research
- Collaborative research on media art and culture in Central and Eastern Europe
- Book (2)
- Book (3)
- Book (4)
- Book (5)
Editorial board
Please feel free to contact us.
- Dušan Barok, db at societyofalgorithm dot org
- Barbora Šedivá, babuta at 34 dot sk
- Guy van Belle, xgz at societyofalgorithm dot org
- Nina Czegledy, czegledy at interlog dot com
- Lenka Dolanová, lenka.dol at gmail dot com
- Eva Krátká, eva.kratka at avu dot cz
Contact
Coordination: Dusan Barok, db at societyofalgorithm dot org
Wiki: http://www.burundi.sk/monoskop/
Delicious: http://del.icio.us/tag/monoskop
Supported by Col-me, Bratislava, http://www.col-me.info, http://col-me.info/sk/node/13
Partner: Wyspa Institute Of Art, Gdansk, http://www.wyspa.art.pl/
Partner: Nina Czegledy, Budapest
Partner: Mlok Association, Prague, http://mlok-org.net
Supported by ERSTE Foundation, http://www.erstestiftung.org
Supported by International Visegrad Fund, http://www.visegradfund.org
Supported by Academy of Arts, Banská Bystrica, http://www.aku.sk