Difference between revisions of "Kinoautomat"

From Monoskop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
Ivo Anderle: “As you might know, originally at the end of the 60s all the big Hollywood studios were asking Mr Cincera for Kinoautomat licensing. Unfortunately in the Socialist era this was not possible, it was the property of the state which did not care so much about selling it, so Kinoautomat was not lucky.”
 
Ivo Anderle: “As you might know, originally at the end of the 60s all the big Hollywood studios were asking Mr Cincera for Kinoautomat licensing. Unfortunately in the Socialist era this was not possible, it was the property of the state which did not care so much about selling it, so Kinoautomat was not lucky.”
  
 +
; Literature
 +
* Erkki Huhtamo, "[http://gebseng.com/media_archeology/reading_materials/Erkki_Huhtamo-Kinoautomat.pdf Push the Button, Kinoautomat will do the Rest! Media-archaeological Reflections on Audience Interactivity]", 2007.
  
 +
; See also
 +
[[Czech_Republic#Experimental_film.2C_avant-garde_film]]
 +
 +
; External links
 
http://www.kinoautomat.cz/<Br>
 
http://www.kinoautomat.cz/<Br>
 
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinoautomat<br>
 
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinoautomat<br>
Line 22: Line 28:
 
http://www.naimark.net/writing/badidea.html
 
http://www.naimark.net/writing/badidea.html
  
See also: [[Czech_Republic#Experimental_film.2C_avant-garde_film]]
 
  
 
[[Category:Experimental film]]
 
[[Category:Experimental film]]

Revision as of 20:02, 23 May 2013

Film in the Czech pavilion at Expo '67 in Montreal, and was promoted as the world's first interactive movie. It was film-based, and all members of the audience had a red and a green button in front of them (the results of voting was displayed around the screen). The movie itself was a dark comedy about a man who believes he was responsible for his apartment building burning down, and is structured as a series of flashbacks leading up to the fire. After each scene the film would stop and a live performer would walk onto the stage and ask the audience to vote. Immediately, as if by magic, the voted scene was played.

How did they do it? Deceipt, of sorts. The branching structure wasn't tree-like, doubling the number of scenes needed at each choice, but rather always remained only two. They did this by carefully crafting a story such that no matter which of the two options were chosen, it would end up back at the same next choice. The vote was executed by the projectionist switching one lens cap between the two synchronized projectors. The artfulness, ultimately, was not in the interaction but in the illusion of interaction. The film's director, Radúz Činčera, made it as a satire of democracy, where everyone votes but it doesn't make any difference.

Authors: Radúz Činčera, directors Jan Roháč and Vladimír Svitáček, scenographer Josef Svoboda, and Jaroslav Frič and Bohumil Mika.


Despite the film’s success in Montreal, it wasn’t shown in Prague until four years later, in 1971. It was so popular that there were screenings twice a day. But less than a year later the Communists had banned it. Alena Cincerova explains why.

“All this group of authors was so-called ‘politically unconfident’, they didn’t like them so much and I think that was the main reason the film was put in the safe, like many other beautiful films from the so-called New Wave era, the golden era, of Czech cinematography.”

Ivo Anderle: “As you might know, originally at the end of the 60s all the big Hollywood studios were asking Mr Cincera for Kinoautomat licensing. Unfortunately in the Socialist era this was not possible, it was the property of the state which did not care so much about selling it, so Kinoautomat was not lucky.”

Literature
See also

Czech_Republic#Experimental_film.2C_avant-garde_film

External links

http://www.kinoautomat.cz/
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinoautomat
http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/works/kinoautomat/
http://www.smartlab.uk.com/2projects/kinoautomat2.htm
http://youtube.com/watch?v=flfBxtpq-PI
http://www.radio.cz/en/article/92388
http://www.naimark.net/writing/trips/praguetrip.html
http://www.naimark.net/writing/badidea.html