Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Monoskop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
we can speak about monoskop here.
 
we can speak about monoskop here.
 +
 +
== users ==
 +
 +
monoskop was first announced on 3 Aug 2004 to Guy and Marisa by Dusan by the e-mail:
 +
 +
''i set up a wiki page, here an idea, warschaw-4 plus balkan digital region, collaborative researchinprogress, i dont know a lot about subject,<br>
 +
on right hand, separating postcomm europe is like talking about white and black people, on a left one, 'local thinking' hype is still available,
 +
why not define the context by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media.''
 +
 +
few days later Slavo, Gnd, Ana, Man, and Cuco were asked to participate.
 +
 +
what about the further development and propagation? discussion here:
  
 
== central + east europe geography ==
 
== central + east europe geography ==
Line 14: Line 26:
  
 
::outdated discussion - have the same feeling  
 
::outdated discussion - have the same feeling  
::- too many times built border between west and east by discussing and  
+
::- too many times built border between west and east by discussing and mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those countries were together in socialistic block  
mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions  
+
::- today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies / subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds  
where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those  
+
::- central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same time to west then us  
countries were together in socialistic block  
+
::- the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...)  
::- today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined  
+
::--[[User:Marisa|Marisa]] 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST)
culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies /  
+
 
subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds  
+
:::about borders and terms for regions etc, of course they tend to be a mix of geography, culture and econo-politics, that change - but do you really think people who are doing creative stuff nowadays are sticking to it, or let their attitude be depending on it? it is more of a thing I wonder about when I am here in the west (bordered by atlantic and north sea - so no escape that way) than east -- and see, I am using the terms as oppositions to indicate extremes, a 1-dimensional reductionism (left-right, east-west) but: you are there and me here and I look around and ... well what is the real difference? --[[User:XGZ|XGZ]] 10:37, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)
::- central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital  
+
 
media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same  
+
== other topics ==
time to west then us  
 
::- the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic  
 
talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative  
 
but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...)  
 
--[[User:Marisa|Marisa]] 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST)
 

Revision as of 15:57, 6 August 2004

we can speak about monoskop here.

users

monoskop was first announced on 3 Aug 2004 to Guy and Marisa by Dusan by the e-mail:

i set up a wiki page, here an idea, warschaw-4 plus balkan digital region, collaborative researchinprogress, i dont know a lot about subject,
on right hand, separating postcomm europe is like talking about white and black people, on a left one, 'local thinking' hype is still available, why not define the context by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media.

few days later Slavo, Gnd, Ana, Man, and Cuco were asked to participate.

what about the further development and propagation? discussion here:

central + east europe geography

the former Monoskop geo discourse was targeted to CE+EE territory, after the discussion, the geo was widened to Europa. talk to this subject not over, there is much more to answer.

why not define the context by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media. --Dusan, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)

just europa (geographically), and changing perception and expressivity, no? --XGZ 20:02, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)

hm, central+east europe vs rest of the world outdated discussion? what have i been doing all that time? hibernating? missed the paradigm update. come back to 90s and send me the link to upgrade me, possible? sth to read. how did it all happened? east/west 0's&1's media discourse. any good references? --Dusan, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)

whellllllllllll started reading: balkan as a metaphor (between globalization and fragmentation) by dusan bjelic and obrad savic, mit press 2002 --XGZ 19:38, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
outdated discussion - have the same feeling
- too many times built border between west and east by discussing and mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those countries were together in socialistic block
- today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies / subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds
- central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same time to west then us
- the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...)
--Marisa 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST)
about borders and terms for regions etc, of course they tend to be a mix of geography, culture and econo-politics, that change - but do you really think people who are doing creative stuff nowadays are sticking to it, or let their attitude be depending on it? it is more of a thing I wonder about when I am here in the west (bordered by atlantic and north sea - so no escape that way) than east -- and see, I am using the terms as oppositions to indicate extremes, a 1-dimensional reductionism (left-right, east-west) but: you are there and me here and I look around and ... well what is the real difference? --XGZ 10:37, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)

other topics