Difference between revisions of "Ostranenie"

Revision as of 14:47, 10 December 2017

	Studies
Anthropology, Art history, History of architecture, Biomechanics, Classics, Commons, Cultural techniques, Cyberfeminism, Cybernetics, Decolonial aesthetics, Design research, Digital humanities, Information theory, Marxist aesthetics, Media archaeology, Media ecology, Mediology, Modern periodical studies, Neuroaesthetics, Neural aesthetics, Philosophy of technology, Posthumanities, Postmedia, Poststructuralism, Semiotics, Sensory ethnography, Software studies, Structuralism, Systems theory. Art writers, Film writers, Music writers, Writers.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ; Literature
 * Frank Kessler, [http://www.montage-av.de/pdf/052_1996/05_2_Frank_Kessler_Ostranenie.pdf "Ostranenie. Zum Verfremdungsbegriff von Formalismus und Neoformalismus"], ''montage a/v'', 5/2/1996, pp 51-65. {{de}}
-* Annie van den Oever (ed.), ''[https://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=605865 Ostrannenie. On 'Strangeness' and the Moving Image: The History,Reception, and Relevance of a Concept]'' , Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010, 278 pp. [http://en.aup.nl/books/9789048507955-ostrannenie.html]. Reviews: [http://www.rug.nl/research/arts-in-society/_afbeeldingen/ostranneniereview.pdf], [http://www.academia.edu/2281571], [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17411548.2014.973703?journalCode=rseu20], [http://www.film-philosophy.com/index.php/f-p/article/download/891/817].
+* Annie van den Oever (ed.), ''[http://monoskop.org/log/?p=16906 Ostrannenie. On 'Strangeness' and the Moving Image: The History, Reception, and Relevance of a Concept]'', Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010, 278 pp. [http://en.aup.nl/books/9789048507955-ostrannenie.html]. Reviews: [http://www.rug.nl/research/arts-in-society/_afbeeldingen/ostranneniereview.pdf Cox], [http://www.academia.edu/2281571 Spiegel], [http://sci-hub.tw/10.1080/17411548.2014.973703 Peden].
 ; See also