Dominic Lopes: A Philosophy of Computer Art (2009)
Filed under book | Tags: · aesthetics, art criticism, computer art, digital art, performance, philosophy, video games

What is computer art? Do the concepts we usually employ to talk about art, such as ‘meaning’, ‘form’ or ‘expression’ apply to computer art?
A Philosophy of Computer Art is the first book to explore these questions. Dominic Lopes argues that computer art challenges some of the basic tenets of traditional ways of thinking about and making art and that to understand computer art we need to place particular emphasis on terms such as ‘interactivity’ and ‘user’.
Drawing on a wealth of examples he also explains how the roles of the computer artist and computer art user distinguishes them from makers and spectators of traditional art forms and argues that computer art allows us to understand better the role of technology as an art medium.
Publisher	Routledge, 2009
ISBN	041554761X, 9780415547611
160 pages
review (Joshua Noble, Creative Applications Network)
review (Timothy Binkley, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism)
review (Jim Andrews, CIAC)
PDF (updated on 2013-4-28)
Comments (2)Bruno Latour, Peter Weibel (eds.): Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (2005)
Filed under book, catalogue | Tags: · aesthetics, art, assemblage, democracy, philosophy, political economy, politics, science, societya, technology, things

“In this editorial and curatorial project, more than 100 writers, artists, and philosophers rethink what politics is about. In a time of political turmoil and anticlimax, this book redefines politics as operating in the realm of things. Politics is not just an arena, a profession, or a system, but a concern for things brought to the attention of the fluid and expansive constituency of the public. But how are things made public? What, we might ask, is a republic, a res publica, a public thing, if we do not know how to make things public? There are many other kinds of assemblies, which are not political in the usual sense, that gather a public around things—scientific laboratories, supermarkets, churches, and disputes involving natural resources like rivers, landscapes, and air. The authors of Making Things Public—and the ZKM show that the book accompanies—ask what would happen if politics revolved around disputed things. Instead of looking for democracy only in the official sphere of professional politics, they examine the new atmospheric conditions—technologies, interfaces, platforms, networks, and mediations that allow things to be made public. They show us that the old definition of politics is too narrow; there are many techniques of representation—in politics, science, and art—of which Parliaments and Congresses are only a part.”
The authors include Richard Rorty, Simon Schaffer, Peter Galison, Richard Powers, Lorraine Daston, Richard Aczel, and Donna Haraway; their writings are accompanied by excerpts from John Dewey, Shakespeare, Swift, La Fontaine, and Melville. More than 500 color images document the new idea of what Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel call an “object-oriented democracy.”
Publisher 	MIT Press, 2005
ISBN	0262122790, 9780262122795
1072 pages
Review: Anthony Iles (Mute).
PDF (82 MB, updated on 2020-7-13)
Comment (1)Christoph Menke: The Sovereignty of Art: Aesthetic Negativity in Adorno and Derrida (1988–)
Filed under book | Tags: · aesthetics, art, deconstruction, literary criticism, literary theory, metaphysics, mimesis, philosophy

“Recent discussions of aesthetics, whether in the hermeneutic or the analytic tradition, understand the place of art and aesthetic experience according to a model of “autonomy”—as just one among the many modes of experience that make up the realm of reason, situated beside the other “spheres of value.” In contrast, Theodor Adorno and Jacques Derrida view art and aesthetic experience as a medium for the dissolution of nonaesthetic reason, an experientially enacted critique of reason. Art is not only autonomous, following its own law, different from nonaesthetic reason, but sovereign: it subverts the rule of reason.
In this book Christoph Menke attempts to explain art’s sovereign power to subvert reason without falling into an error common to Adorno’s negative dialectics and Derrida’s deconstruction. The error, which already appeared in romanticism, is to conceive of the sovereignty of art as reflecting the superiority of its knowledge. For art entails no knowledge and its negativity toward reason cannot be articulated as an insight into the nature of reason: art is sovereign not despite, but because of, its autonomy. Menke brings to his arguments a firm grounding in both philosophy and literary studies, as well as familiarity with German, French, and American sources.”
First published in German as Die Souveränität der Kunst: Ästhetische Erfahrung nach Adorno und Derrida, Athenäum, Frankfurt am Main, 1988.
Translated by	Neil Solomon
Publisher	MIT Press, 1998
Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought series
ISBN	0262631954, 9780262631952
310 pages
PDF (updated on 2021-7-12)
Comments (2) 
 
